of the IRM and Figures 4 and 5
configurations.
In some ways, I like the look of it and it, or some of its ideas
might be desirable. The same concept can be used in the larger
scales, but the space required will force greater space and
materials, with associated costs, in addition to the generally
higher cost of the large-scale equipment.
Even though it seems a simple flat table top and shelf layout,
it can be finished to an attractive and realistic setting. An illus-
tration of the finished layout is shown in Figure 1. Along the
narrow wall shelf, the tracks should cross a small creek with a
combination of a small timber bridge, plate girder bridge, or
concrete culvert to add interest.
Layout structures
Buildings would include at least one station, an interlocking
tower, office and storage, plus shop buildings, trolley stops, and
covered sheds in lieu of enclosed buildings protecting some of
the equipment. The addition of operating track signals along
the operating lines, and a display of various signals will add
interest, just as they do at the IRM. The IRM also has a wonder-
ful display of signs, including old interurban railways, and even
locomotive builder EMD and significant and architecturally
pleasing portions of former railroad buildings.
A combination of all these features along with the more utili-
tarian office, storage, and shop buildings will add interest and
character. Trolley poles will be added, including some with
double poles with an adjoining span over the track. But I do
not envision actually stringing wire, and don’t think that will
detract from the effect.
